I'm open to talking on clubhouse someday.

I just want to clear up some inaccuracies in how you read my piece and in what you appear to know about Etherium's history.

I am not saying ETH should not evolve.

I'm actually saying that they did promise to implement proof of stake when they launched. They also did make a promise that code was law. I'm not simply suggesting that that is my opinion. I'm saying that that is what they said. You can verify that for yourself. But then they failed to deliver proof of stake and the broke the code is law promise. And they did it over and over again.

You also seem to be under the impression that energy use itself of any kind is bad for the environment. I'm not going to try to school you on that here, but again encourage you to do some homework. If you want to look I have two pieces here on medium about it. One is called "Why Bitcoin's Energy Use is Not Harmful to the Environment" and the other is a short story called "Moving Heaven and Earth: How Bitcoin and Humans Will Actually Save the World".

Lastly, fact that you as a miner have accepted being made to sacrifice when others have not - you make the full sacrifice but you don't get full reward - shows that you have fallen for the fanciful tales I speak about. Why are you made to sacrifice, repeatedly, by others who sacrifice nothing? And do you really believe there will be a reliable system that works with no work and is without leaders in control? I'll leave it at that. If you want to read another piece of mine that is relevant I'd say it's the piece called "Bitcoiners are not Toxic: They Have Integrity". That's my most popular article and I think that one contrasted with this one really highlights what matters so much to bitcoiners and why they are offended by the things I brought up in this article.